Friday, April 29, 2011

Intel touts 50Gbps interconnect by 2015, will make it work with tablets and smartphones too

Woah there, Mr. Speedy. We've barely caught up with the 10Gbps Thunderbolt interconnect, debuted in the new Macbook Pro, and now Intel's hyperactive researchers are already chattering away about something five times faster. They're promising a new interconnect, ready in four years, that will combine silicon and optical components (a technology called silicon photonics) to pump 50Gbps over distances of up to 100m. That's the sort of speed Intel predicts will be necessary to handle, say, ultra-HD 4k video being streamed between smartphones, tablets, set-top boxes and TVs. Intel insists that poor old Mr. Thunderbolt won't be forced into early retirement, but if we were him we'd be speaking to an employment lawyer right about now.

Intel touts 50Gbps interconnect by 2015, will make it work with tablets and smartphones too originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:58:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink TG Daily  |  sourceIDG News (PC World)  | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intel-touts-50gbps-interconnect-by-2015-will-make-it-work-with/

Lawson Software Level 3 Communications Lexmark International Liberty Global Linear Technology

The Creepiest Royal Wedding Photo Ever, Courtesy Of Color

Well, the Royal Wedding is over. Wasn't that wonderful? If you weren't watching on TV, there were about a million ways to participate online. Millions watched on YouTube, Livestream and elsewhere. And even those who were there uploaded their own photos and videos, including this guy. �I'll call him the masked Union Jack freak. Is that some sort of S&M suit he's wearing? It doesn't seem proper juxtaposed with the royal newlyweds. You can find pictures of him on a special Color Royal Wedding Album created by people using the iPhone social camera app and sponsored by the British paper, The Telegraph. You remember Color, the $41 million photo app that created a huge backlash in the press and some confusion among consumers about exactly how to use the app.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/b6l1k6KDADo/

Ses Shaw Communications Si International Siemens Silicon Laboratories

Microsoft Versus Google: European Edition

It's getting vicious between Google and Microsoft.

Last week, I wrote a few articles for eWEEK discussing the antitrust complaint Microsoft filed with the European Commission, pillorying Google as an 800-pound gorilla in the world of search.

"We're concerned by a broadening pattern of conduct aimed at stopping anyone else from creating a competitive alternative," Brad Smith, Microsoft's senior vice president and general counsel, wrote in a March 30 statement posted on the Microsoft on the Issues blog. "We've therefore decided to join a large and growing number of companies registering their concerns about the European search market."

His posting argued that Google restricts other search engines from property cataloging YouTube videos in search results, that it prevents those YouTube videos from running well on Windows Phones, that it blocks access to book publishers' content and that it restricts advertisers' access to their own data.

In addition, Smith accused Google of contractually blocking "leading Websites in Europe from distributing competing search boxes" and discriminating against competitors by raising the price for prominent placement in Google advertisements.

The European Commission, of course, spent years chasing Microsoft around the block over supposed anti-competitive practices related to Internet Explorer. Eventually, Redmond executives relented to releasing a "Web browser choice screen" that gave Windows users in the European Union a selection of browsers other than IE.

Google didn't take Microsoft's EC filing very well.

"We're not surprised that Microsoft has done this, since one of their subsidiaries was one of the original complainants," a Google spokesperson wrote in a March 31 e-mail to eWEEK. "For our part, we continue to discuss the case with the European Commission, and we're happy to explain to anyone how our business works."

By "one of their subsidiaries," the spokesperson is referring to Ciao! from Bing, an online-community portal aimed at a handful of Western European markets. Back in February 2010, the European Commission notified Google that Ciao, along with U.K. price-comparison Website Foundem and French legal search engine ejustice.fr, had filed complaints about Google's effect on European search-engine competition. Foundem is a member of ICOMP, a lobbying group sponsored by Microsoft.

Is Microsoft's move surprising? Not really.

Redmond is pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into supporting its Bing search engine, in exchange for incremental market-share gains (which add up, to be fair; if you add Bing.com's share with what the search engine earns from powering Yahoo's back-end search, Microsoft can claim close to 30 percent of the market, according to research firm comScore).

At the same time, Microsoft is also attempting to carve out a presence in the smartphone market with Windows Phone 7. Several rivals occupy that territory: Research In Motion, Apple, Google and (soon) Hewlett-Packard's re-launched Palm franchise. But it's Google's burgeoning market share that seems to have everyone else concerned.

Lastly, there's also the business cloud side of the equation. Google and Microsoft have been battling for several quarters over government and corporate contracts for their respective cloud IT services. In November 2010, Google filed a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging that the Department of the Interior unfairly restricted its bid to update its email and messaging system in favor of Microsoft's BPOS-Federal suite. That action alone hints at the animosity level between the two companies.

So a lawsuit with the European Commission is just another twist in what promises to be a long battle, one in which both sides seem willing to do anything to gain even a small advantage over the other.


Source: http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/MicrosoftWatch/~3/qYZnsxnHUqs/microsoft_versus_google_european_edition.html

Perot Systems Phillips Planar Systems Powerchip Semiconductor Priceline.Com

Alpha Bike concept: free-wheeling fixie for flip-floppers

So Philliebot was a fail, but this chainless bicycle serves as proof that UPenn doesn't always come up short. The Alpha Bike, designed by a group of engineering students, contains an entirely internal drivetrain that allows riders to switch between fixed-gear and multi-gear setups. The simple switch is enabled by an electronically controlled clutch, part of the Switchable Integrated Free-Fixed Transmission (SWIFT), discreetly hidden in the bike's frame. Populating the front hub are a drum brake and a dynamo, which juices the bike's electronics -- the back hub contains a three-speed gear set, put in motion by a simple push-pull cable. When the front wheel starts rolling, an LED screen mounted in the carbon fiber handlebars is illuminated, displaying time, cadence, and speed, among other things -- this data and more is stored on an accessible SD card. As of now, the bike is still a prototype, but if you start saving now, you might actually have enough scratch to buy one when it comes to fruition.

Alpha Bike concept: free-wheeling fixie for flip-floppers originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:06:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Wired  |  sourceAlpha Bike  | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/alpha-bike-concept-free-wheeling-fixie-for-flip-floppers/

Hewlett Packard Co Hewlett-Packard High Tech Computer Hon Hai Precision Ind Hynix Semiconductor

It?s Face Time: Google Talk For Android Phones Gets Video Chat Support

If you're on an Android device, you may know that there are already plenty of ways to conduct video and voice calls using various third party applications (Qik, Fring, etc.). But that functionality has never been included with stock builds of Android (at least, not for phones), the way Apple's FaceTime has been integrated into iOS for the last year. Today, that's starting to change. Google is currently rolling out an update to Nexus S devices that adds voice and video chat to Google Talk, which is included as part of the core set of Google applications that come pre-installed on many Android devices. The feature will work on both Wi-Fi and 3G/4G wireless networks, and allows calls between phones, tablets, and any computer with Gmail and Google Talk enabled. The update is gradually rolling out over the air (a process that usually takes a couple weeks), and it also includes numerous bug fixes. The Nexus One will be getting an update as well, but it won't include the video chat support (it doesn't have a front-facing camera, though it would have been nice to have a voice-only feature for VoIP calls).

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/Z5iJpX_wehc/

Rf Micro Devices Rockwell Automation Rogers Communications Saic Salesforce Com

Motorola Xoom software update brings SSL and Widevine DRM, no LTE quite yet (update: pulled)

Seems like Verizon, Motorola and Google are on a bit of a security bent -- the latest update for the Motorola Xoom lets you take a far more leisurely tour of the internet's walled gardens. There's a WPA-PSK security fix to allow choice users into your mobile hotspot, SSL for secure web browsing, Google's Widevine DRM for viewing locked online video content and HDCP for piping it to your TV. Of course, there's no mention of the Xoom feature we're truly waiting for, but we'll happily take our Bluetooth mouse support and POP3 email in the meanwhile. Droid-Life reports that this HMJ07B update will start hitting Xooms later today, but Verizon's still got a month to make good on those LTE promises.

Update: We're not quite sure what happened, but Droid-Life discovered that Verizon's update-detailing PDF has been pulled, so it's probably better to not expect an OTA upgrade later this afternoon.

[Thanks, K]

Motorola Xoom software update brings SSL and Widevine DRM, no LTE quite yet (update: pulled) originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:41:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Droid-Life  |  sourceVerizon (PDF)  | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/motorola-xoom-software-update-brings-ssl-and-widevine-drm-no-lt/

Priceline.Com Progress Software Qimonda Qlogic Qualcomm

Microsoft vs. i4i: Yes, This Is Important

Microsoft is currently locked in legal battle with i4i, a small Canadian company that has argued for years that Word 2003 and 2007 violated its patents related to custom XML. The two sides argued their case before the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this week, officially making it a Very Big Deal. More to the point, depending on who wins, it could radically affect patent law in this country.

During the April 18 arguments, Microsoft's legal counsel insisted that the current standard of proof for invalidating patents is too high, making it difficult for companies to repulse frivolous patent-infringement suits. "When the Patent Office didn't even consider the evidence, it makes absolutely no sense," Microsoft attorney Thomas Hungar told the court, according to an April 18 Bloomberg report.

If Microsoft triumphs, it could establish a precedent that makes it easier for big companies to knock down weak intellectual-property lawsuits. That would help slam the brakes on "patent trolling," an annoyance for many large tech companies. Those companies filing briefs in support of Microsoft range from Google to Cisco Systems.

But i4i is arguing that existing patent law is necessary for innovation.

"It is abundantly clear that the fundamental change in the law, which Microsoft seeks, would result in an enormous decrease in innovation," i4i Chairman Loudon Owen wrote in an April 18 statement. "Microsoft did not present either policy or legal reasons that would justify any changes to the law, particularly the sweeping change they now apparently seek."

So if i4i wins, it could potentially help smaller companies fight larger aggressors in open court. Those filing briefs in support of i4i include 3M, General Electric and Genentech.

"The bottom line: Tech vendors attacked by patent trolls are only asking for payback by reducing the standards in patent law," Ray Wang, principal analyst of Constellation Research, wrote to me in an April 19 email. "If Microsoft wins, it's a check and balance against patent trolls. If i4i wins, innovators who feel their rights have been trampled by large evil tech vendors will have protected their rights."

Microsoft's battle with i4i goes back to August 2009, when the federal judge in the U.S. District Court in Eastern Texas ordered that all copies of Word 2003 and 2007 be removed from retail channels within 90 days, after i4i argued that the word-processing software violated its key patents for custom XML. Microsoft's attorneys managed to impose a delay, only to have the U.S. Court of Appeals uphold the verdict four months later.

Microsoft also found itself hit with a nearly $300 million judgment, which if upheld could sting the company's bottom line a wee bit.

That upheld verdict came with the court order that all offending copies of Word be yanked from store shelves by early January 2010. Microsoft refused to give in, issuing a patch for Word it claimed would sidestep the alleged infringement, and asking for a review by all 11 judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

That effort failed, and Microsoft appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case. A decision should come by late June.


Source: http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/MicrosoftWatch/~3/eoxmDKqZW0g/microsoft_vs_i4i_yes_this_is_important.html

Electronics For Imaging Elpida Memory Emc Ems Technologies Emulex