Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/OB48zy5O-h0/
Amkor Technology Amphenol Anixter International Apple Computer Applied Materials
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/OB48zy5O-h0/
Amkor Technology Amphenol Anixter International Apple Computer Applied Materials
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/CRPSoMMEZVI/
Logitech International Lsi Manhattan Associates Mantech International Maximus
LG Optimus Pad coming to Rogers May 17th originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 14 May 2011 03:38:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/14/lg-optimus-pad-coming-to-rogers-may-17th/
Mantech International Maximus Mcafee Memc Electronic Materials Mentor Graphics
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/VENfmgfD_y0/
Lm Ericsson Logitech International Lsi Manhattan Associates Mantech International
Continue reading T-Mobile baking fresh prepaid plans May 22, adds more 4G data for flavor
T-Mobile baking fresh prepaid plans May 22, adds more 4G data for flavor originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 14 May 2011 00:53:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/14/t-mobile-baking-fresh-prepaid-plans-may-22-adds-more-4g-data-fo/
Grupo Iusacell Harris Hcl Technologies Heartland Payment Systems Hewlett Packard Co
During the April 18 arguments, Microsoft's legal counsel insisted that the current standard of proof for invalidating patents is too high, making it difficult for companies to repulse frivolous patent-infringement suits. "When the Patent Office didn't even consider the evidence, it makes absolutely no sense," Microsoft attorney Thomas Hungar told the court, according to an April 18 Bloomberg report.
If Microsoft triumphs, it could establish a precedent that makes it easier for big companies to knock down weak intellectual-property lawsuits. That would help slam the brakes on "patent trolling," an annoyance for many large tech companies. Those companies filing briefs in support of Microsoft range from Google to Cisco Systems.
But i4i is arguing that existing patent law is necessary for innovation.
"It is abundantly clear that the fundamental change in the law, which Microsoft seeks, would result in an enormous decrease in innovation," i4i Chairman Loudon Owen wrote in an April 18 statement. "Microsoft did not present either policy or legal reasons that would justify any changes to the law, particularly the sweeping change they now apparently seek."
So if i4i wins, it could potentially help smaller companies fight larger aggressors in open court. Those filing briefs in support of i4i include 3M, General Electric and Genentech.
"The bottom line: Tech vendors attacked by patent trolls are only asking for payback by reducing the standards in patent law," Ray Wang, principal analyst of Constellation Research, wrote to me in an April 19 email. "If Microsoft wins, it's a check and balance against patent trolls. If i4i wins, innovators who feel their rights have been trampled by large evil tech vendors will have protected their rights."
Microsoft's battle with i4i goes back to August 2009, when the federal judge in the U.S. District Court in Eastern Texas ordered that all copies of Word 2003 and 2007 be removed from retail channels within 90 days, after i4i argued that the word-processing software violated its key patents for custom XML. Microsoft's attorneys managed to impose a delay, only to have the U.S. Court of Appeals uphold the verdict four months later.
Microsoft also found itself hit with a nearly $300 million judgment, which if upheld could sting the company's bottom line a wee bit.
That upheld verdict came with the court order that all offending copies of Word be yanked from store shelves by early January 2010. Microsoft refused to give in, issuing a patch for Word it claimed would sidestep the alleged infringement, and asking for a review by all 11 judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
That effort failed, and Microsoft appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case. A decision should come by late June.
Rf Micro Devices Rockwell Automation Rogers Communications Saic Salesforce Com
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/Ueh5pJf8Y5Q/
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/EiVANhAp8-M/
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/Ubbn8IQ1RYQ/
Ke Kingston Technology Company Kla-Tencor Koninklijke Kpn L-1 Identity Solutions
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/j9TcrlOtj6Y/
Under the terms of the agreement, Skype becomes a business division within Microsoft, headed by Skype CEO Tony Bates. Skype's services will be meshed with a variety of products in Microsoft's portfolio, including its Lync unified-communications platform, Outlook, and Xbox Live.
That $8.5 billion is a substantial markup from the $2.6 billion eBay agreed to pay for Skype way back in 2005, or the $1.9 billion a team of private investors shelled out in 2009. Did Microsoft overpay?
According to one analyst, the answer's a definite Yes.
"Wall Street hated the deal when eBay bought it, and they only paid 1/4 of what Microsoft is now paying," Roger Kay, founder and president of Endpoint Technologies Associates, wrote in an email to me this morning. "In eight years, Skype hasn't made any money, and even at the operating level, it would take three decades to pay out in cash terms alone."
Other analysts took a more optimistic perspective.
"Skype refreshes the Microsoft customer base with 170 million early-adopter progressive users," Ray Wang, principal analyst and CEO at Constellation Research, wrote me. "Microsoft gets a social platform that accelerates its work on Lync. Microsoft will gain a VoIP platform critical for future unified communications."
What does Microsoft buy for that $8.5 billion?
Momentum
Skype's customer base totals around 170 million users, which gives Microsoft considerable influence within the evolving VoIP and video-conferencing market--and momentum to its existing communications offerings. For example, if Microsoft goes through with its plans to bake Skype software into future Windows Phone releases (over the carriers' screams of bloody murder), it could create a mobile platform strong enough to overshadow Apple's FaceTime and Android's anemic video-conferencing offerings. If Microsoft integrates Skype with Xbox Kinect, that could help forward the company's designs on the living room.
Keep Away
Guess who doesn't own Skype? Google or Cisco. Either one of those companies seizing Skype's assets--or initiating some sort of far-reaching partnership--could have placed Microsoft at a sizable disadvantage in the VoIP and video-conferencing arena. Over the past few days, rumors suggested that either Google or Facebook could make some sort of Skype play.
That didn't exactly play out. Nonetheless, during the May 10 press conference to walk through the deal, Tony Bates neatly dodged the question of whether other companies had been in the running to acquire Skype: "We were very focused on our IPO, we had an unsolicited offer [from Microsoft], we made an evaluation."
Competitive Strength
"Product-wise, this could be a nice fit," ABI Research senior analyst Aapo Markkanen wrote in a May 10 research note forwarded to media. "Microsoft has several areas in both consumer and enterprise sectors that will benefit from a top-notch VoIP, video and sharing solution. All of the synergies may never realize, but even the promise of them goes a long way explaining why the price may not seem that right."
Windows Phone could also benefit from the acquisition. "A preinstalled, well-integrated Skype client could be a potent differentiator for Windows Phone devices vs. Androids, iPhone and BlackBerry," Markkanen added.
Personally, I think this deal is complex enough--and Microsoft's existing offerings overlapping enough--to place a great deal of weight on the tactical execution. If Microsoft can figure out ways to seamlessly integrate Skype with its existing offerings, then the potential benefits could be enormous over the longer term. That being said, I think there are also sizable opportunities to flub an integration this enormous. Whoever Microsoft tasks with digesting Skype, they better be on their game.
What do you think?
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/Ubbn8IQ1RYQ/
Land Software Lawson Software Level 3 Communications Lexmark International Liberty Global
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/VfTmLOLRmhI/
Microsemi Microsoft Millicom Intl. Cellular Miscrosoft Office Mobile Telesystems
Solar Impulse's first international flight is underway (live) originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 13 May 2011 05:56:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/13/solar-impulses-first-international-flight-is-underway-live/
If some early adopters didn't take those charts well, it could perhaps be excused: according to the one for the United States, three Windows Phone 7 devices are currently in the "Testing" phase for both the March "NoDo" and February updates.
Another two phones are in the "Scheduling" phase, with no firm date of arrival. While the February update was feature-free, and designed to pave the way for future updates, the "NoDo" update is supposed to add cut-and-paste functionality in addition to a range of other tweaks and improvements.
In theory, scheduling should take 10 days or less, to be followed by a "Delivery" stage that could take several weeks before arriving on an actual smartphone. The situation's a little better on the global chart, where at least some devices have begun "delivering" the update.
That was all before Joe Belfiore, Microsoft's corporate vice president and director of Windows Phone program management, appeared on the company's Channel 9 Website to talk about the upcoming MIX11 conference. During the conversation, he suggested the whole Windows Phone 7 process was well under way, which didn't seem to win him many friends among the site's commenters.
That anger compelled Belfiore to modify his commentary.
"People were officially getting it, the success rate of its deployment on real-world phones was looking good, and we were happy that the process had started well," he wrote in a March 27 posting on the Channel 9 comments section. "Still--these are not the same as all of you getting it and I'm sorry that I came across as insensitive to that fact."
It perhaps bears repeating that, according to Microsoft's own chart, nobody in the United States is currently receiving "NoDo," and likely won't for at least the next couple of weeks. Or longer.
Belfiore's comment then added something I've been rolling around in my head for the past day or so: "We know the table would benefit greatly from more detail, and we are hoping to add more to it by working with the operators who own the 'testing' phase to get more clarity," he wrote. "If your phone is shown in 'scheduling,' it'll be worth checking the table next week."
During this January's Consumer Electronics Show in Vegas, I talked with some Microsoft reps about Windows Phone 7. During that conversation, they suggested that, while the carriers could technically deny an update from arriving on Windows Phone 7 devices, Microsoft didn't foresee that becoming an issue. I walked away with the impression that Microsoft had ceded a certain level of control over its software platform and updates to the carriers... and that the company was keeping its fingers crossed that the collaboration wouldn't spiral out of control.
Welcome to the spiral.
From the very beginning, Microsoft executives have suggested that Windows Phone 7 will avoid the fragmentation that plagued Windows Mobile. Unified software upgrades across all devices and carriers, they added, was something that would prevent their new software platform from falling into the same trap as Android, which is present in multiple different versions on a broad constellation of smartphones.
But what these charts suggest to me (reinforced by Belfiore's comment that "operators own the 'testing' phase") is that Windows Phone 7 is at risk of splintering like a cheap piece of wood. Unlike Apple, which took charge of pushing out software updates from Day One, Microsoft decided to cede a significant part of the upgrade process to carriers who, quite frankly, have a conflict of interest. If AT&T is already selling the iPhone and a broad array of Google Android devices, are they going to trip over themselves rushing to update Windows Phone 7? The answer's no.
And yet, instead of taking control of the situation, even Microsoft doesn't seem to know when NoDo is arriving on this HTC HD7 on my desk. The HTC Arrive (the first Windows Phone 7 device on a CDMA network) sidesteps these issues by arriving with the software updates pre-installed, but early adopters who purchased the GSM-based smartphones are very unhappy.
I have to say, for the first time, I'm starting to think Windows Phone 7 is in trouble.
Nuance Communications Nvidia On Semiconductor Openwave Systems Oracle
Receive the latest reviews, how-to's, news, and more.
Source: http://feeds.pcworld.com/click.phdo?i=50771524eabc743fb3da551aa0dec918
Ixys Jack Henry & Associates Jda Software Group Jds Uniphase Kddi
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/XsntmF615Cs/
Epicor Software F5 Networks Factset Research Systems Fair Isaac Fairchild Semiconductor International
Continue reading Industrial robots do Star Wars better than Lucas
Industrial robots do Star Wars better than Lucas originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 11 May 2011 16:41:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/11/industrial-robots-do-star-wars-better-than-lucas/
Siemens Silicon Laboratories Skyworks Solutions Sonic Automotive Sonus Networks