Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/V6E1H80oj3g/
Sykes Enterprises Inorated Symantec Synnex Synopsys Syntax-Brillian
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/V6E1H80oj3g/
Sykes Enterprises Inorated Symantec Synnex Synopsys Syntax-Brillian
Xcom Global's international MiFi rentals getting cheaper, Eurotrips making a comeback originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/xcom-globals-international-mifi-rentals-getting-cheaper-eurotr/
Earthlink Eastman Kodak Eclipsys Electronic Arts Electronic Data Systems
Toshiba's ET100/WT100 Honeycomb tablet clears the FCC originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:34:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/30/toshibas-et100-wt100-honeycomb-tablet-clears-the-fcc/
In an FAQ posted on its corporate Website, Apple attempted to clarify its position on location-logging.
"The iPhone is not logging your location," reads one section. "Rather, it's maintaining a database of WiFi hotspots and cell towers around your current location, some of which may be located more than 100 miles away from your iPhone, to help your iPhone rapidly and accurately calculate its location when requested."
Apple goes on to insist that the iPhone only stores a protected subset of that total crowd-sourced database. "The location data that researchers are seeing on the iPhone is not the past or present location of the iPhone, but rather the locations of WiFi hotspots and cell towers surrounding the iPhone's location," reads the FAQ, "which can be more than 100 miles away from the iPhone."
Perhaps anxious to avoid attracting that same sort of negative attention, Microsoft moved to place its Windows Phone location-data policies front-and-center.
"When you allow an application or game to access your device's location, the application or game will connect to Microsoft's location services and request the approximate location of the device," reads the FAQ posted on Microsoft's corporate Website. "The location service will respond by providing the application or game with the location coordinates of the user's device (when available), which the application or game can then use to enrich the user experience."
Microsoft's location services apparently rely on a database of local cell towers and known WiFi access points to "provide an approximate location of the user's device." In addition to WiFi access points, those services can also leverage a device's GPS (when available) to provide observed longitude, latitude, direction and speed.
The FAQ also insists the location services "will only collect information when you allow a particular application to request location information and that particular application requests location information." While Windows Phone apparently doesn't save any location data to a smartphone's memory, Microsoft also doesn't mention whether any information transmitted back to the company is encrypted in transit.
In addition, Microsoft also insisted that any location information "is not shared with mobile operators," and that users can deny applications access to their location information.
Windows Phone users, does that explanation make you feel more secure? Or are you already reaching for the tinfoil hats?
Eastman Kodak Eclipsys Electronic Arts Electronic Data Systems Electronics For Imaging
Continue reading Desk Phone Dock review
Desk Phone Dock review originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:20:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/desk-phone-dock-review/
F5 Networks Factset Research Systems Fair Isaac Fairchild Semiconductor International Fei Company
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/7jNLcl9AI7Q/
Amphenol Anixter International Apple Computer Applied Materials Arian Semiconductor Equipment
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/99Zwolbla-4/
Syntax-Brillian Syntel Take-Two Interactive Software Technitrol Teletech Holdings
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/XVleoYcXqFc/
Nintendo Nokia Novell Novellus Systems Nuance Communications
Intel touts 50Gbps interconnect by 2015, will make it work with tablets and smartphones too originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:58:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/intel-touts-50gbps-interconnect-by-2015-will-make-it-work-with/
Lawson Software Level 3 Communications Lexmark International Liberty Global Linear Technology
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/b6l1k6KDADo/
Ses Shaw Communications Si International Siemens Silicon Laboratories
Last week, I wrote a few articles for eWEEK discussing the antitrust complaint Microsoft filed with the European Commission, pillorying Google as an 800-pound gorilla in the world of search.
"We're concerned by a broadening pattern of conduct aimed at stopping anyone else from creating a competitive alternative," Brad Smith, Microsoft's senior vice president and general counsel, wrote in a March 30 statement posted on the Microsoft on the Issues blog. "We've therefore decided to join a large and growing number of companies registering their concerns about the European search market."
His posting argued that Google restricts other search engines from property cataloging YouTube videos in search results, that it prevents those YouTube videos from running well on Windows Phones, that it blocks access to book publishers' content and that it restricts advertisers' access to their own data.
In addition, Smith accused Google of contractually blocking "leading Websites in Europe from distributing competing search boxes" and discriminating against competitors by raising the price for prominent placement in Google advertisements.
The European Commission, of course, spent years chasing Microsoft around the block over supposed anti-competitive practices related to Internet Explorer. Eventually, Redmond executives relented to releasing a "Web browser choice screen" that gave Windows users in the European Union a selection of browsers other than IE.
Google didn't take Microsoft's EC filing very well.
"We're not surprised that Microsoft has done this, since one of their subsidiaries was one of the original complainants," a Google spokesperson wrote in a March 31 e-mail to eWEEK. "For our part, we continue to discuss the case with the European Commission, and we're happy to explain to anyone how our business works."
By "one of their subsidiaries," the spokesperson is referring to Ciao! from Bing, an online-community portal aimed at a handful of Western European markets. Back in February 2010, the European Commission notified Google that Ciao, along with U.K. price-comparison Website Foundem and French legal search engine ejustice.fr, had filed complaints about Google's effect on European search-engine competition. Foundem is a member of ICOMP, a lobbying group sponsored by Microsoft.
Is Microsoft's move surprising? Not really.
Redmond is pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into supporting its Bing search engine, in exchange for incremental market-share gains (which add up, to be fair; if you add Bing.com's share with what the search engine earns from powering Yahoo's back-end search, Microsoft can claim close to 30 percent of the market, according to research firm comScore).
At the same time, Microsoft is also attempting to carve out a presence in the smartphone market with Windows Phone 7. Several rivals occupy that territory: Research In Motion, Apple, Google and (soon) Hewlett-Packard's re-launched Palm franchise. But it's Google's burgeoning market share that seems to have everyone else concerned.
Lastly, there's also the business cloud side of the equation. Google and Microsoft have been battling for several quarters over government and corporate contracts for their respective cloud IT services. In November 2010, Google filed a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging that the Department of the Interior unfairly restricted its bid to update its email and messaging system in favor of Microsoft's BPOS-Federal suite. That action alone hints at the animosity level between the two companies.
So a lawsuit with the European Commission is just another twist in what promises to be a long battle, one in which both sides seem willing to do anything to gain even a small advantage over the other.
Perot Systems Phillips Planar Systems Powerchip Semiconductor Priceline.Com
Alpha Bike concept: free-wheeling fixie for flip-floppers originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:06:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/29/alpha-bike-concept-free-wheeling-fixie-for-flip-floppers/
Hewlett Packard Co Hewlett-Packard High Tech Computer Hon Hai Precision Ind Hynix Semiconductor
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/Z5iJpX_wehc/
Rf Micro Devices Rockwell Automation Rogers Communications Saic Salesforce Com
Motorola Xoom software update brings SSL and Widevine DRM, no LTE quite yet (update: pulled) originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:41:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsSource: http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/motorola-xoom-software-update-brings-ssl-and-widevine-drm-no-lt/
During the April 18 arguments, Microsoft's legal counsel insisted that the current standard of proof for invalidating patents is too high, making it difficult for companies to repulse frivolous patent-infringement suits. "When the Patent Office didn't even consider the evidence, it makes absolutely no sense," Microsoft attorney Thomas Hungar told the court, according to an April 18 Bloomberg report.
If Microsoft triumphs, it could establish a precedent that makes it easier for big companies to knock down weak intellectual-property lawsuits. That would help slam the brakes on "patent trolling," an annoyance for many large tech companies. Those companies filing briefs in support of Microsoft range from Google to Cisco Systems.
But i4i is arguing that existing patent law is necessary for innovation.
"It is abundantly clear that the fundamental change in the law, which Microsoft seeks, would result in an enormous decrease in innovation," i4i Chairman Loudon Owen wrote in an April 18 statement. "Microsoft did not present either policy or legal reasons that would justify any changes to the law, particularly the sweeping change they now apparently seek."
So if i4i wins, it could potentially help smaller companies fight larger aggressors in open court. Those filing briefs in support of i4i include 3M, General Electric and Genentech.
"The bottom line: Tech vendors attacked by patent trolls are only asking for payback by reducing the standards in patent law," Ray Wang, principal analyst of Constellation Research, wrote to me in an April 19 email. "If Microsoft wins, it's a check and balance against patent trolls. If i4i wins, innovators who feel their rights have been trampled by large evil tech vendors will have protected their rights."
Microsoft's battle with i4i goes back to August 2009, when the federal judge in the U.S. District Court in Eastern Texas ordered that all copies of Word 2003 and 2007 be removed from retail channels within 90 days, after i4i argued that the word-processing software violated its key patents for custom XML. Microsoft's attorneys managed to impose a delay, only to have the U.S. Court of Appeals uphold the verdict four months later.
Microsoft also found itself hit with a nearly $300 million judgment, which if upheld could sting the company's bottom line a wee bit.
That upheld verdict came with the court order that all offending copies of Word be yanked from store shelves by early January 2010. Microsoft refused to give in, issuing a patch for Word it claimed would sidestep the alleged infringement, and asking for a review by all 11 judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
That effort failed, and Microsoft appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case. A decision should come by late June.
Electronics For Imaging Elpida Memory Emc Ems Technologies Emulex